COVID19: A French Point-of-View
Many read the reports of sky-high COVID-19 deaths in France in alarm, igniting both panic and caution there and elsewhere as the virus allegedly infected an increasing number of nations, creating what appeared to be a pandemic of historic proportion. What really happened and what is still happening will be explored here from its many angles.
March 16, 2020
The government talks about confining people at home due to a very dangerous virus in China.
The population CANNOT go outside their homes. Individuals who have important jobs can do so but only with the written permission of the CEO. You can go shopping only if needed and only near your home.
Offenders will pay a 135€ fine if caught.
Masks are obligatory and a safe zone is defined when in contact with others. But the masks were never provided... none for sale anywhere… the prices raised by 40 dollars for a masks and it was decided that it only protects you for three to four hours.
A French doctor, Pascal Trotta, explains to the French people that he is not afraid of the Coronavirus and that he is much more afraid of the deprivation of our fundamental freedoms to move, work and meet. He delivers a message of hope indicating that there is a diagnosis and a treatment (this is Chloroquine, which is no longer available in pharmacies!).
So why put 60 million French people in prison?
Rumors surfaced very fast saying that anyone who died in a hospital MUST be diagnosed with COVID19, even if that person died of cancer.
Is the excess mortality recorded in March 2020 due to misdiagnosis under the government directives?
Nationally, 57,441 deaths were recorded in 2020 in France compared to 52,011 in 2019, according to the National Institute of Statistics and Economic Studies (INSEE). This number "nevertheless remains lower than the number of deaths recorded over the same period in 2018 (58,641 deaths in France), the year when the seasonal flu was still virulent in March," further explains INSEE.
Data from INSEE published on this date shows that several departments of Grand Est, Ile-de-France and Hauts-de-France recorded an excess mortality of more than 40 percent in March 2020 compared to March 2019. "The Haut-Rhin is still distinguished by a very large excess of mortality between March 1 and 30, 2020 compared to the same period in 2019 (+ 128%)", details the institute.
"Five other departments record a number of deaths occurring in March 2020 more than 40 percent higher than that observed in 2019 on the same dates: Seine-Saint-Denis (+62%), Hauts-de-Seine (+56% ), Vosges (+ 55%), Oise (+ 42%), Moselle (+ 41%). "
Compared to the year 2018, the overall mortality of March 2020 was lower when there was no confinement or around-the-clock media hype designed to modify our behavior and to scare us.
The excess mortality rates in certain departments show that there was indeed an infectious agent present, but government directives, rather than reducing mortality, seemed to have made matters worse. Apparently, not to clutter the hospital "emergencies" unnecessarily, it was decided at the beginning of contamination that "infected" people would stay home with a simple protocol of paracetamol. Meanwhile, infectious disease specialist, Professor Didier Raoult maintained that these patients should be treated from the start with hydroxychloroquine (Plaquenil) and the antibiotic Azithromycin, which when administered would avoid most hospitalizations.
The government directive states that the disease develops quietly in the contaminated until the moment when they reaches a serious stage with respiratory problems. This advanced situation is what is required before hospitalization. Once at the hospital, patients would be separated into two categories: those under the age of 70, who are able to benefit from all available medical protocols, and those over 70, who "would not benefit from relentless therapy.
We are told that they have hospitalized only severe cases so as not to clutter hospitals, yet 90% of hospitals and clinics were empty in France. Having canceled their current operations in view of the epidemic, as well as closing medical offices due to patient fear of contamination, it was possible to help all patients at the start of the contamination. This low hospitalization rate was also due to the fact that doctors, sharing their experiences on the news networks, relayed that they could easily cure this disease at its inception with simple antibiotics, a directive many followed.
Here too, in the Ehpad (specialized houses for the elderly), certain criminal decisions have been undertaken, such as a ban on transferring the elderly and sick to hospitals so as not to clutter them unnecessarily. Also, strategic misdirection ensued as doctors attending the Ehpad lacked authorization to prescribe the effective Raoult Protocol, while they were provided with the authorization to prescribe Rivotril, so as to euthanize Seniors and contributing to wide-scale, unnecessary tragedy.
To restate: the elderly of France were sacrificed by the withholding of admittance to hospitals and of all effective treatment due to the government directive that it was useless to care for people of more than 70 years of age.
These deaths make it possible to increase the mortality statistics by the COVID19, especially since they were not tested and therefore automatically classified as deceased from COVID19. We are told that it is not possible to treat individuals at this age, but in England, a 106-year-old woman survived COVID19, and general practitioners worldwide have successfully treated elderly people with certain classes of antibiotics or with intravenous Vitamin C, a protocol administered in some countries to treat cancer or pneumonia.
In previous years, pneumonia deaths were combined with influenza deaths so as to create a higher influenza mortality. This is because the flu is not very fatal today due to introduction of heated housing. Before this, the weakening effects of the flu prevented one from utilizing wood to create heat. To encourage people to get vaccinated, they inflated the number of flu deaths. The real flu is around 10 percent of official statistics of influenza mortality. Now it's COVID-19 mortality statistics that they inflate so as to scare individuals enough to get vaccinated. Wouldn't it be better to return to the beneficial and effective methods of natural prevention that strengthen the immune system so that we can resist pathogenic germs? Today, some people get scurvy, an ancient disease of seafarers who suffered from the lack of Vitamin C after a few months of being at sea. This proves that modern food is super deficient in Vitamin C, a nutrient essential for good health and which can even cure Coronavirus, as some doctors have demonstrated in China, the United States and Germany.
Vitamin C is particularly effective against pneumonia (among other ailments). A few days of intravenous Vitamin C (between 20 and 100g per day) solves this problem quickly. Big Pharma does not offer many effective solutions without side effects, so why use overpriced and ineffective antivirals when this economical molecule is available? Big Pharma doesn't want it because it doesn't bring in big profits. This is why the French Government has blocked all Vitamin C shipments from within France, and from being imported.
One thing is clear, the deaths of French citizens could have been prevented had the government been more on top of the virus, especially with the elderly.
Source: Dr Pascal Trotta, Former Intern of the Paris Hospitals, Laureate of the Faculty of Medicine of Paris V Specialist Doctor, Radiologist, Homeopath, Founder of the Institute of Natural Medicine of San Sebastian, Institute of Natural Medicine of Dr Trotta, Paseo de los fueros 3, 20005 San Sebastian
Tel: 0034 943 059 203 / 0034 679 48 45 48
Benjamin is a foreign correspondent for UNC living in France. He has lived all over the world including Alaska and the Caribbean.